
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
| Mechanics | Overall, the thesis/research question, context and methodology of the paper is executed in an excellent way | Overall, the thesis/research question, context and methodology is executed well. | Overall, the thesis/research question, context and methodology is executed in a moderate way. | Overall, the thesis/research question, context and methodology is executed inadequately. |
| Analysis | The author provides an interesting, astute or distinctive analysis of the topic and does not simply summarize the topic. | The author provides a fairly interesting, astute or distinctive analysis of the topic and does little summary of it. | The author provides an analysis of the topic, which is moderately interesting, astute or distinctive, but there is considerable summary. | The author summarizes information, does not provide an interesting, astute or distinct analysis of the topic. |
| Writing | There is clear communication in the submission and it shows exceptional understanding of the issues involved in the research question. | The communication is fairly clear in the submission and it shows a thorough understanding of the issues involved in the research question. | The communication is moderately clear in the submission and it shows a general understanding of the issues involved in this question. | The communication in the submission is unclear and shows a limited understanding of the issues involved in the research question. |
| Syntax | Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors are rare and do not detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is good (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). | Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors are minimal and do not detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is good (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). | Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors are noticeable and at times detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is fair (some run-on sentences, sentence structure is questionable). | Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors are frequent and detract from reading the paper. |
| Format | The submission is within the 6000 word limit, contains adequate citations where needed, uses credible sources, uses a citation style consistently. | The submission is within the 6000 word limit, contains adequate citations where needed, uses credible sources, uses a citation style consistently. | The submission is outside of the 6000 word limit, mostly contains adequate citations where needed, uses credible sources, uses a consistent citation style but with errors. | The submission is outside of the 6000 word range, has inadequate citations when needed, lacks credible sources, contains an inconsistent citation style. |
| Accuracy of Information | The information in the submission is entirely accurate and consistent. Where necessary, information is qualified and explained. | The information in the submission is mostly accurate and consistent. Any errors are minor, easily correctible, and do not invalidate the argument. | A fair amount of information in the submission is incorrect. This does not invalidate the entire paper, but revisions, explanations and qualifications, and recontextualisation may be needed. | Much of the submission is factually incorrect, to the extent where the argument is invalid, even with major corrections. |